Table 3 Cross tabulations of MC Attitudes, MC Skills, MC Use, MC Barriers, and MC Facilitators and the EBP Attitudes, EBP Skills and EBP Use
EBP Attitudes | ||
|---|---|---|
Disagree (sub-score < 32) | Agree (sub-score > = 32) | |
N = 104 | N = 208 | |
MC attitudes, n (%) | ||
Use of instruments (such as West Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory or STarT back) are useful tools in my profession for appropriately prescription on maintenance care | ||
Strongly disagree | 5 (5) | 16 (8) |
Disagree | 35 (34) | 26 (13) |
Neutral | 47 (45) | 103 (50) |
Agree | 16 (15) | 49 (24) |
Strongly agree | 1 (1) | 14 (7) |
MC skills, n (%) | ||
I have sufficient skills to identify the patients which responds well and poorly to maintenance care | ||
Low skills | 5 (5) | 10 (5) |
Low-medium skills | 7 (7) | 18 (9) |
Medium skills | 32 (31) | 65 (31) |
Medium–high skills | 47 (45) | 89 (43) |
High skills | 13 (13) | 26 (13) |
MC use, n (%) | ||
I have used published information to find the appropriate patient group for which maintenance care is recommended | ||
0 times | 58 (56) | 114 (55) |
1–5 times | 33 (32) | 54 (26) |
6–10 times | 5 (5) | 18 (9) |
11–15 times | 4 (4) | 8 (4) |
16 + times | 4 (4) | 14 (7) |
MC barriers, n (%) | ||
Access to useful resources (e.g., questionnaires, relevant articles) to implement subgrouping of patients before one can evaluate if maintenance care is appropriate is: | ||
Not a barrier | 18 (17) | 43 (21) |
A minor barrier | 44 (42) | 84 (40) |
A moderate barrier | 32 (31) | 65 (31) |
A major barrier | 10 (10) | 16 (8) |
MC facilitators, n (%) | ||
Having the knowledge of which patient groups responds positively or negatively to maintenance care is: | ||
Not useful | 5 (5) | 8 (4) |
Slightly useful | 13 (13) | 20 (10) |
Moderately useful | 44 (42) | 48 (23) |
Very useful | 42 (40) | 132 (63) |
EBP Skills | ||
|---|---|---|
Poor-average (sub-score < = 39) | Average-good (sub-score > 39) | |
N = 143 | N = 169 | |
MC attitudes, n (%) | ||
Use of instruments (such as West Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory or STarT back) are useful tools in my profession for appropriately prescription on maintenance care | ||
Strongly disagree | 8 (6) | 13 (8) |
Disagree | 38 (27) | 23 (14) |
Neutral | 66 (46) | 84 (50) |
Agree | 26 (18) | 39 (23) |
Strongly agree | 5 (4) | 10 (6) |
MC skills, n (%) | ||
I have sufficient skills to identify the patients which responds best and worst to maintenance care | ||
Low skills | 7 (5) | 8 (5) |
Low-medium skills | 14 (10) | 11 (7) |
Medium skills | 39 (27) | 58 (34) |
Medium–high skills | 75 (52) | 61 (36) |
High skills | 8 (6) | 31 (18) |
MC use, n (%) | ||
I have used published information to find the appropriate patient group for which maintenance care is recommended | ||
0 times | 83 (58) | 89 (53) |
1–5 times | 47 (33) | 40 (24) |
6–10 times | 5 (2) | 18 (11) |
11–15 times | 6 (4) | 10 (6) |
16 + times | 12 (7) | |
MC barriers, n (%) | ||
Access to useful resources (e.g., questionnaires, relevant articles) to implement subgrouping of patients before one can evaluate if maintenance care is appropriate is: | ||
Not a barrier | 24 (17) | 37 (22) |
A minor barrier | 50 (35) | 78 (46) |
A moderate barrier | 54 (38) | 43 (25) |
A major barrier | 15 (10) | 11 (7) |
MC facilitators, n (%) | ||
Having the knowledge of which patient groups responds positively or negatively to maintenance care is: | ||
Not useful | 4 (3) | 9 (5) |
Slightly useful | 11 (8) | 22 (13) |
Moderately useful | 46 (32) | 46 (27) |
Very useful | 82 (57) | 92 (54) |
EBP Use | ||
|---|---|---|
Never-rarely use (sub-score < = 8) | Sometimes use (sub-score > 8) | |
N = 172 | N = 140 | |
MC attitudes, n (%) | ||
Use of instruments (such as West Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory or STarT back) are useful tools in my profession for appropriately prescription on maintenance care | ||
Strongly disagree | 9 (5) | 12 (9) |
Disagree | 39 (23) | 22 (16) |
Neutral | 78 (45) | 72 (51) |
Agree | 39 (23) | 26 (19) |
Strongly agree | 7 (4) | 8 (6) |
MC skills, n (%) | ||
I have sufficient skills to identify the patients which responds best and worst to maintenance care | ||
Low skills | 5 (3) | 10 (7) |
Low-medium skills | 15 (9) | 10 (7) |
Medium skills | 52 (30) | 45 (32) |
Medium–high skills | 84 (49) | 52 (37) |
High skills | 16 (9) | 23 (16) |
MC use, n (%) | ||
I have used published information to find the appropriate patient group for which maintenance care is recommended | ||
0 times | 106 (62) | 66 (47) |
1–5 times | 57 (33) | 30 (21) |
6–10 times | 6 (3) | 17 (12) |
11–15 times | 1 (1) | 11 (8) |
16 + times | 2 (1) | 16 (11) |
MC barriers, n (%) | ||
Access to useful resources (e.g., questionnaires, relevant articles) to implement subgrouping of patients before one can evaluate if maintenance care is appropriate is: | ||
Not a barrier | 30 (17) | 31 (22) |
A minor barrier | 75 (44) | 53 (38) |
A moderate barrier | 53 (31) | 44 (31) |
A major barrier | 14 (8) | 12 (9) |
MC facilitators, n (%) | ||
Having the knowledge of which patient groups responds positively or negatively to maintenance care is: | ||
Not useful | 8 (5) | 5 (4) |
Slightly useful | 15 (9) | 18 (13) |
Moderately useful | 51 (30) | 41 (29) |
Very useful | 98 (57) | 76 (54) |