Skip to main content

Table 4 Associations between MC attitude, MC skills, and MC use and demographic variables

From: Evidence-based maintenance care among chiropractors in Norway: a cross-sectional survey in the Nordic maintenance care program

 

MC attitudes

MC skills

MC use

 

OR

95% CI

OR

95% CI

OR

95% CI

Gender

Ref women

1.19

(0.70 to 2.04)

0.90

(0.57 to 1.47)

1.62

(1.00 to 2.62)

Age

20–39

Ref

     

40–59

1.48

(0.50 to 4.39)

0.37*

(0.14 to 0.96)

0.88

(0.35 to 2.21)

60 + 

4.24

(0.82 to 1.72)

0.53

(0.11 to 2.69)

1.09

(0.24 to 4.93)

Years in practice

0–5

Ref

     

6–10

0.55

(0.25 to 1.21)

1.02

(0.50 to 2.11)

0.94

(0.46 to 1.94)

11–15

0.42

(0.15 to 1.13)

1.68

(0.70 to 4.03)

0.74

(0.31 to 1.74)

16 + 

0.47

(0.13 to 1.75)

2.98

(0.92 to 9.61)

0.48

(0.15 to 1.52)

Clinical setting

Solo

Ref

     

w/chiropractors

0.96

(0.32 to 3.04)

0.70

(0.25 to 2.01)

1.22

(0.45 to 3.30)

w/conventional health providers

1.22

(0.44 to 3.39)

0.36*

(0.14 to 0.93)

0.86

(0.35 to 2.12)

w/CM

1.47

(0.27 to 7.69)

0.47

(0.10 to 2.27)

0.87

(0.18 to 4.22)

w/CM and conventional health providers

1.00

(0.34 to 2.98)

0.45

(0.17 to 1.24)

1.06

(0.41 to 2.78)

Country of education

England

Ref

     

Denmark

0.82

(0.37 to 1.83)

0.78

(0.39 to 1.56)@

0.69

(0.34 to 1.37)

USA

0.58

(0.22 to 1.55)

2.64*

(1.04 to 6.66)

0.55

(0.23 to 1.30)

Australia

0.63

(0.21 to 1.84)

3.08*

(1.17 to 8.12)

0.34*

(0.13 to 0.85)

Constant

0.39

(0.10 to 1.54)

2.61

(0.73 to 9.37)

0.70

(0.20 to 2.40)

  1. CM = Complementary Medicine
  2. The 95% CI not crossing 1 are marked with a * (implying a significant difference in outcome)